The 2008 contest for the White House may go down in history as the first social media election. How else to explain the unprecedented role the Web played in this year’s Presidential contest, an influence scarcely imaginable just four years ago? In 2004 many social networking sites were just getting off the blocks. YouTube, for example, was introduced early the following year. And microblogging sites like Twitter wouldn’t emerge until the 2008 Presidential campaign was getting under way.
It’s not just that individual voters had access to a wider range of information about candidates and their positions on issues. Unlike in any other Presidential election, the electorate could harness a panoply of social media tools — blogs, social networks, photo and video sharing sites — to broadcast to the world their thoughts about the candidates and their experiences of the electoral process.
Voters’ willingness to bring the democratic process to the Web was made most plain on Nov. 4. While the act of voting has traditionally been considered a private activity, on this Election Day voters enthusiastically parted the voting booth curtain to share their experiences on the Internet. Some wanted to advertise their support of a particular candidate or ballot measure. Others saw it as a chance to shine a light on flaws inherent to the election process. Whatever the reason, phone cameras and other multimedia devices were common at polling places, as many voters felt compelled to make a record of their experience in pictures and video and then upload and share them through sites like Flickr and Google’s YouTube, both of which hosted special pages for election content.
Facebook Vote Tally
Many of their images recorded the unique characteristics of the 2008 election: huge numbers of young people and minorities casting ballots — some for the first time. Voters also encountered…